‘Loved the torture video’: New Epstein Files emails expose DP World Chairman Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem discussed disturbing sexual details with Jeffrey Epstein

DP World Chief’s Decade-Long Sex-Fueled Emails with Convicted Pedophile Epstein Exposed

A newly published investigation has thrust one of the Gulf’s most powerful business figures into a global scandal after previously unseen emails between convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, the chairman and CEO of UAE logistics giant DP World, were revealed in recently released US Department of Justice documents. The correspondence, which spans more than a decade, includes crude sexual discussions alongside business talk, stirring intense international scrutiny and questions about elite networks that remained tied to Epstein long after his 2008 conviction.The revelations highlight not only the enduring reach of Epstein’s influence but also how private communications involving powerful figures are reshaping perceptions of global business and power networks in 2026.

The core findings between Jeffrey Epstein and Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem: Sex, business and long-term correspondence

According to reporting by Bloomberg, the emails show Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem continued to correspond with Jeffrey Epstein, even after Epstein’s 2008 conviction on charges that included procuring a minor for prostitution. These exchanges included explicit discussions of women, sexual experiences and personal details alongside traditionally professional messages.

The correspondence reportedly stretched from before Epstein’s conviction into the 2010s, well after he had served jail time and remained a controversial figure. In various emails, bin Sulayem is said to have shared graphic descriptions of sexual encounters and information about women with Epstein, content widely viewed as inappropriate for a high-profile corporate leader. The emails revealed crude language and objectifying references to women, including mentions of massages, physical descriptions and personal interactions that go beyond standard business content, signalling a familiarity that has raised eyebrows among commentators and ethics observers.US Rep Thomas Massie claimed that a particularly disturbing exchange was sent by Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem. According to lawmakers who viewed unredacted Department of Justice documents, one email from the files contains Epstein writing “I loved the torture video” to a redacted recipient; Massie has asserted that the unnamed sender in that email, described only as a “Sultan”, is likely bin Sulayem, prompting calls for the DOJ to disclose the full unredacted files publicly.

The contents of the referenced video have fuelled debate over transparency, ethics and elite networks connected to Epstein’s long-standing global relationships. Public reactions on this subject is based on secondary analysis of partially redacted government files and statements by US lawmakers as official DOJ releases have not to date directly named individuals in the context of this specific email exchange.

Why these emails between Jeffrey Epstein and Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem are making headlines now

The timing of this report is critical as prosecutors released over three million pages of Epstein-related documents in early 2026, providing unprecedented public access to his archived communications with political leaders, corporate executives and other influential figures around the world. The resulting media investigations have revealed that many in Epstein’s network remained in contact long after his conviction, often in surprisingly frank and personal ways. In this larger tranche of documents, diplomats, billionaires, public officials and CEOs appear in exchanges that range from purely professional to socially intimate. This illustrates how Epstein’s influence extended far beyond his known criminal conduct, encompassing powerful social and economic relationships that persisted for years.DP World, one of the world’s largest port operators that is responsible for a significant share of global container traffic, has so far declined to comment publicly on the specific allegations arising from the emails. While bin Sulayem remains a central figure in Dubai’s commercial elite, the organisation has not issued an official statement addressing the content or context of the Epstein correspondence as of this writing.

This silence mirrors responses from some other parties mentioned in the wider Epstein files, who have often chosen not to engage publicly with journalistic inquiry into sensitive historical communications.

Epstein’s global elite network

Epstein, who died in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges, has long been known for cultivating ties with powerful individuals across sectors. The newly released files underscore that even after his conviction, Epstein continued to connect with influential figures. For example, other reporting on the 2026 release shows Epstein’s role in facilitating meetings between business leaders and politicians, including those linked to UAE-Israel diplomatic backchannels and investment networks.International coverage also highlights that Epstein maintained friendships and communications with political and tech elites, sometimes with controversial content, even after his conviction, suggesting that his social and professional reach remained extensive. These connections are not limited to business correspondence as some emails include lewd jokes, personal invitations and discussions of sensitive subjects that have fuelled ethical and public accountability debates.

Public and political reaction on Jeffrey Epstein and Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem’s latest emails

The disclosure of the emails has reverberated across political and media landscapes. US commentators and lawmakers have pointed to the need for transparency and accountability regarding individuals named in the documents, especially when those individuals hold influential positions in global commerce or governance. In some countries, revelations from the Epstein files have already led to resignations, public apologies and policy responses as more details about longstanding personal and professional networks emerge.

Reactions in the Gulf region are more muted publicly, with much of the commentary circulating on international media and social platforms rather than official statements. However, analysts note that any association with Epstein can have reputational implications, particularly for executives and leaders seeking to position their organisations as global players in a complex and highly scrutinised economic environment. The bin Sulayem-Epstein emails add to a broader pattern documented in the 2026 releases: powerful individuals maintaining long-term relationships with Epstein in contexts that blur professional, social and personal lines. Critics argue these patterns demonstrate how elite networks can insulate powerful figures from public scrutiny, even in cases of serious criminal conduct.

Some of the documentation shows that Epstein used his contacts to broker business opportunities, introductions and diplomatic leverage further complicating the narrative that he was solely a discredited social pariah after 2008. Observers also point out that the circulation of emails involving sexual content, personal gossip and crude exchanges raises questions about professional judgement and ethics, especially when tied to individuals who continue to hold influential corporate or public positions.

Potential ramifications and what comes next in Epstein files

While no legal charges have been publicly announced against bin Sulayem in connection with these emails, the public disclosure of unfiltered private communications raises reputational and ethical questions. In the U.S. and Europe, similar exposures have led to investigations, resignations and policy reforms aimed at curbing undue influence by individuals with questionable associations.

In the Gulf region, where elite figures often move between business, governance and royal circles, these revelations could influence future reporting, investor perceptions and discussions around transparency in corporate leadership. Some analysts suggest that this may prompt broader public conversations about how powerful individuals engage with controversial figures and the implications for governance, corporate responsibility and ethical leadership. Others believe it could pressure companies to adopt stricter internal communication standards and transparency measures when executives interact with known criminals or figures under legal scrutiny.Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem’s emails with Jeffrey Epstein adds a new chapter to the ongoing story of how Epstein built and maintained an extraordinary network of influence, one that extended far beyond his criminal convictions and into the private exchanges of world-leading executives. Whether these revelations will translate into legal, corporate or political consequences remains to be seen. What is clear, however, is that in 2026 the Epstein files continue to upend assumptions about elite networks, privilege and accountability at the highest levels of global commerce and society. Go to Source