Ram Temple donation case: SIT Widens Ayodhya Probe as Land Deals, Bank Records and Donation Assets Face Scrutiny

The Special Investigation Team (SIT) has significantly expanded its investigation into the alleged financial irregularities linked to the Ayodhya Ram Temple, widening its focus beyond the reported donation misappropriation to include land acquisitions, financial transactions, and trust records. According to sources cited in the report, investigators are now expected to conduct a fresh audit of the trust’s bank accounts covering the past five years while examining expenditure records and donations received in the form of jewellery and other valuables. As part of the second phase of the inquiry, the SIT has reportedly questioned key individuals associated with the temple administration, including General Secretary Champat Rai, Trustee Anil Mishra, and Gopal Rao, who has been linked to construction and management responsibilities. Investigators are examining financial documentation and other evidence as part of the ongoing probe. The developments have also triggered political and religious reactions. Senior BJP leader Vinay Katiyar stated that the investigation should continue independently and said that any action against individuals should be based on the findings of the SIT and the legal process. He maintained that authorities must determine accountability after completing the investigation. Meanwhile, differing opinions have emerged within sections of the religious community. Some temple-associated figures have publicly raised allegations regarding financial management and land-related transactions, while others have urged patience until the investigation concludes. These allegations remain under investigation and have not been established by any judicial authority. The SIT’s expanded inquiry reflects a broader effort to verify financial records, trace transactions, and establish whether any irregularities occurred in the administration of temple funds or property acquisitions. Officials are expected to continue collecting evidence before submitting their final findings, which could shape the next phase of legal and administrative action.

Go to Source