A member of the BBC’s board has resigned over what he says are “governance issues” at the top of the corporation.
Shumeet Banerji also said in a letter that he was “not consulted” about the events leading up to the departures of the director general, Tim Davie, and BBC News chief executive, Deborah Turness.
Banerji confirmed his resignation on Friday, the BBC said in a statement.
BBC News has approached Banerji for comment.
The BBC’s two top executives resigned earlier in November as a result of the fallout over a Panorama episode that edited together parts of a 2021 speech by US President Donald Trump.
Since then, concerns have been raised in some quarters about the functionality of the BBC board, which is responsible for oversight and strategy of the corporation.
In blaming governance issues, Banerji appears to have made a direct criticism of chairman Samir Shah and other members of the board.
Banerji’s resignation comes at a difficult time for the BBC, with Shah and board members Sir Robbie Gibb and Caroline Thomson due to give evidence to the Culture Media and Sport Committee of MPs on Monday afternoon.
Questions have already been raised in Parliament about political appointees on the BBC board (there are five including Shah and Gibb).
They will likely be asked about claims, first made in a leaked document, that the BBC has “systemic issues” relating to coverage around, for example, the Israel-Gaza conflict and coverage of sex and gender. That was rejected by Turness and Davie.
Written by Michael Prescott, who was previously an independent external advisor to the BBC’s Editorial Standards Committee, the document was published by the Telegraph newspaper and also flagged the Panorama edit.
The corporation has since acknowledged the edit gave “the mistaken impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action” on the day of the riot at the US Capitol building on 6 January 2021.
Trump has threatened to sue over the programme, saying it defamed him. While the BBC has apologised, it has refused the president’s demand for financial compensation.
