JD Vance (File Image)
US vice president JD Vance publicly defended an ICE agent who shot dead Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis, and he blamed immigrants, including Somali immigrants, for welfare fraud and rising child-care costs, in remarks and social media posts made the day after the shooting.In a series of posts on X, Vance posted several posts, defending the attack and blaming immigrants in general and Somali immigrants in particular for cheating taxpayers and raising the cost of child care for Americans.
He then denounced Good, accusing her of intentionally attacking a federal agent with her car, and alleged she belonged to a broader network of activists who plotted “to attack, to dox, to assault” federal law enforcement. He also criticised media outlets for covering her killer unsympathetically, the Atlantic reported.The report said Vance’s comments were planned rather than a spontaneous response, and that he did not wait for all the facts. It said he did not express compassion for Good or her family.Vance later posted on X, first promoting a video from the shooter’s point of view, and then arguing with a journalist about the video, saying, “He is allowed to discharge his weapon in self-defense”. The defence of the agent came at a politically sensitive moment. Polling conducted the same day as the shooting showed growing public opposition to ICE tactics, with a majority of Americans describing the agency as overly forceful. Despite this, Vance closely aligned himself with ICE, even as the agency faced heightened scrutiny for a series of violent encounters. Investigations cited at least four fatal ICE shootings since a crackdown began in June, along with more than 30 incidents involving gunfire or agents pointing weapons at civilians.But there is a logic to Vance’s combative stance. Vance clearly understood what ICE means to Trump’s base.For MAGA America, ICE is an instrument for cleansing violence. Look ICE and DHS social media posts that glorified force, including videos of heavily armed agents detaining unarmed individuals and nationalist imagery invoking themes of reclaiming the nation. Critics said this messaging echoed MAGA politics, which they described as prioritising displays of dominance and “respect enforcement” over legal restraint or proportionality.The analysis also highlighted what it called MAGA’s selective support for law enforcement. While the administration defended ICE aggressively, it had pardoned hundreds involved in the January 6 Capitol riot and repeatedly attacked other law-enforcement institutions, including the FBI and federal prosecutors.According to the report, the Minneapolis shooting illustrated this worldview. Video evidence suggested Good was unarmed and attempting to flee, raising legal and ethical questions about the use of deadly force. Yet Vance’s swift and unequivocal defence of the agent was portrayed as consistent with a MAGA ideology that treats perceived disrespect toward authority as intolerable. The report concluded that the episode reflected a broader political stance in which the assertion of power—and punishment for defiance—takes precedence over accountability, due process, and public trust.It increasingly appears that JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have chosen different stages for their political performances. While Rubio emerged as the public face of Washington’s show of force in Venezuela—dominating cable news appearances after the strike—Vance anchored himself to the Minneapolis shooting. Whether Vance was absent from the Venezuela moment by design or by exclusion remains unclear, but the contrast has not gone unnoticed.There are two plausible explanations. One is that Vance was sidelined by foreign-policy hawks who wanted a clean, uncomplicated projection of strength abroad, free of domestic political baggage. The other is that Vance sidelined himself, opting to avoid a volatile foreign-policy gamble that could fracture his carefully cultivated image. Go to Source
