A live television debate turned fiery after controversial remarks by spiritual leader Aniruddhacharya about women sparked widespread backlash. His comment, which appeared to compare modern women to Surpanakha, a demoness from Hindu mythology, drew sharp criticism from fellow panelists and the public alike. One panelist emphasized that spiritual leaders who sit on the revered Vyas Peeth are expected to uphold dignity and compassion. Referencing scripture, the panelist pointed out that even Lord Lakshman addressed Surpanakha with grace, setting an example of respectful conduct—even toward adversaries. Another panelist directly challenged Aniruddhacharya’s interpretation of the scriptures, demanding a specific citation from the Valmiki Ramayan. When no clear reference was produced, tensions rose, with repeated calls for an apology. However, Aniruddhacharya refused to retract his statement, insisting on his interpretation. As the debate escalated, panelists accused him of promoting regressive, patriarchal values under the guise of religious discourse. One panelist went further, calling Aniruddhacharya a “fake guru” and questioned his moral authority to speak on behalf of spiritual tradition. The discussion highlighted broader concerns about sexism in religious spaces, the misinterpretation of scriptures, and the impact of influential figures spreading harmful ideologies. Despite mounting pressure, the show ended without an apology—leaving audiences divided and sparking intense online discussion about respect, gender equality, and religious accountability.
