- Student presented tender document discrepancies to Parliamentary Committee.
- Allegations made regarding changes to tender eligibility and qualifications.
- Concerns raised over modifications to poor performance and blacklisting clauses.
- Student advocates for transparency in educational evaluation and procurement.
The Central Board of Secondary Education’s (CBSE) On-Screen Marking (OSM) system came under renewed scrutiny on Tuesday after a Class 12 student appeared before a Parliamentary Standing Committee to present concerns regarding the evaluation process and alleged irregularities in the tendering mechanism linked to the system.
Sarthak Sidhant, one of the students affected by the implementation of the OSM framework, addressed the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Education, Women, Children, Youth and Sports at the Parliament House Annexe. The committee is currently examining issues related to the adoption of digital evaluation methods in CBSE Class 12 examinations and the concerns raised by students regarding transparency and assessment practices.
Student Presents Findings To Parliamentary Committee
According to sources of PTI, Sidhant delivered a detailed presentation outlining his analysis of CBSE tender documents connected to the On-Screen Marking system. Members of the committee are reviewing the system’s implementation and evaluating complaints submitted by students and other stakeholders.
Ahead of the meeting, Sidhant said his examination of multiple tender documents revealed several inconsistencies that, in his view, warranted closer scrutiny.
“There were many discrepancies. I have just compared them. There were at least 15 discrepancies as per my blog. I would like to highlight three or four of them,” he said.
Delhi: Sarthak Sidhant, one of the students affected by the CBSE’s ‘On-Screen Marking’ (OSM) system, arrived at the Parliament House Annexe to give a presentation before the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Education, Women, Children, Youth, and Sports. This committee is… pic.twitter.com/IYeGHzWdK8
— ANI (@ANI) June 2, 2026
His presentation reportedly focused on changes made to eligibility and qualification requirements across successive tender documents.
ALSO READ: Telangana Teen’s Suicide Sparks Bandh Amid ‘Love Jihad’ Claims; 18-Year-Old Arrested Under POCSO
Allegations Of Changes In Tender Conditions
Sidhant claimed that several provisions included in earlier tender documents were either modified or removed in later versions. He further argued that conditions related to blacklisting, financial qualification thresholds, Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) standards, and project eligibility requirements had undergone significant revisions between different tender stages.
According to Sidhant, these alterations raised questions about procurement practices and the criteria used to evaluate service providers involved in the OSM project.
Research Conducted With Independent Collaborators
The student stated that his findings were the result of months of research conducted alongside ethical hacker Nisarg Adhikari and journalists who had been examining aspects of the issue.
He expressed hope that the concerns he raised would encourage greater transparency in both educational evaluation systems and public procurement processes.
At the same time, Sidhant clarified that his objections were not directed at the concept of digital evaluation itself.
ALSO READ: Monsoon To Reach Kerala On June 4; IMD Warns Of Below-Normal Rainfall This Season
Broader Review Of Education Policies Underway
The parliamentary panel’s review extends beyond the OSM system. The committee is also examining the implementation of the three-language formula in Classes 9 and 10, an issue that has generated discussion in several states.
