Senior political leaders have strongly condemned the detention of a Rajya Sabha member and several activists under the Public Safety Act (PSA), calling the measures excessive and unlawful. They insisted these are not mere claims but factual events: detainees were reportedly restrained, kept confined to guest houses, and prevented from leaving without any visible orders being served. Speakers demanded clarity on the legal basis and asked officials to specify which preventive-detention orders were invoked. They argued that using the PSA against elected representatives undermines democratic norms and sends a dangerous message about civil liberties in the region.Leaders urged those affected to pursue remedies through the Assembly Secretariat or directly with the Speaker, while warning that political disputes should not be settled through preventive detention. Legal counsel experienced in PSA litigation has been recommended; veteran lawyers familiar with these laws are prepared to challenge detentions in court. One speaker recalled successfully fighting a PSA case in 2020 and pledged practical help to families seeking redress.Separately, officials acknowledged transport and logistical constraints and described temporary use of cargo trains for essential supplies, while advocating for permanent refrigerated services for perishable exports. The overarching call was for transparency, lawful procedure, and restraint by authorities to preserve public trust and democratic process.
