European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, from left, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Finland’s President Alexander Stubb, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, President Donald Trump, France’s President Emmanuel Macron, Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, Germany’s Chancellor Friedrich Merz and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte pose for a group photo in the Grand Foyer of the White House, in Washington. (AP/PTI)(AP08_19_2025_000005B)
For Volodymyr Zelenskyy, a whirlwind day in Washington ended with something close to relief. After hours of talks with Donald Trump and a parade of European leaders, NATO chief Mark Rutte declared a “breakthrough”: Trump was willing to consider security guarantees for Ukraine. On the global stage, that alone marks a reset — between the US and Ukraine, between Zelenskyy and Trump, and between Washington and its transatlantic allies. Inside Trump world, though, the reaction is more complicated.
The Oval Office mood shift
February’s disastrous Trump–Zelenskyy encounter is now being described as ancient history. This time, the optics were warmer: Trump praised Zelenskyy’s suit, Vice President JD Vance found easy chemistry with the Ukrainian leader, and officials described the atmosphere as “terrific” and “really productive.” For Zelenskyy, it was the reset he had been pressing for all year.
Europe’s crowded table
Trump’s team went into the meetings wanting to show Europe who was in charge. By their own account, they largely succeeded. “Like a happy family,” one official said of the two-hour huddle, even if seven heads of state meant inevitable jostling. The Europeans, once dismissed as tedious, were unexpectedly constructive. And, officials noted, the earlier Trump–Putin talks in Alaska created just enough space for Monday’s pledges on security guarantees.
The security guarantee puzzle
Trump committed the US to being part of a security framework for Ukraine, but nothing beyond that. Who pays? Who provides troops? Would American peacekeepers be on the table? Insiders admit all this remains undecided, with one official suggesting Trump could accept a temporary US role “if it was the final piece of the puzzle.” That ambiguity has unsettled his base.
Bannon’s warning shot
As Zelenskyy met Trump, Steve Bannon was on his “War Room” podcast warning MAGA against entanglement. An Article 5–style commitment to Ukraine, he argued, would tether America to a European conflict indefinitely. Later, he told POLITICO that Trump had already done enough: “If we don’t fund this, it stops happening. The Europeans don’t have the hardware or the money.” Bannon’s message was clear — security guarantees are a red line for the populist right.
Testing the MAGA bench
Trump’s Truth Social post naming JD Vance, Marco Rubio, and Trump confidant Steve Witkoff as coordinators with Russia and Ukraine raised eyebrows. It was the first time the vice president and secretary of state had been paired on a high-stakes foreign policy file. Inside Trump world, the question is who gets credit if it works — and who takes the fall if it doesn’t. For Europe, the day was a breakthrough. For Zelenskyy, it was vindication. For Trump world, it opened a fault line: a presidency that thrives on avoiding foreign entanglements may be edging toward one — with MAGA’s loudest voices already pushing back. Go to Source
 "The curious case of Xi’s crackdown and stalled superpower ambition: PLA turmoil threatens 2049 military goal")
