CBSE MARKING ROW REACHES COURT: NSUI Moves Delhi HC Seeking Probe Into OSM Evaluation System

The controversy surrounding the Central Board of Secondary Education’s (CBSE) On-Screen Marking (OSM) system has now reached the judicial arena, with the National Students’ Union of India (NSUI) approaching the Delhi High Court seeking an independent investigation into the evaluation process. The petition raises concerns over alleged irregularities in the digital assessment mechanism, verification procedures, and the handling of disputed answer sheets. NSUI has argued that students deserve a transparent and accountable review process, particularly in cases where candidates believe their marks do not accurately reflect their performance. The student body has reportedly sought directions for an impartial inquiry into the functioning of the OSM system and related evaluation practices. In addition to demanding a probe, NSUI has also raised issues concerning the re-verification and re-evaluation process, including calls for greater flexibility for students seeking reassessment of their answer sheets. Among the demands reportedly being discussed are an extension of the verification window, improved grievance redressal mechanisms, and consideration of compensatory measures for students adversely affected by technical or procedural issues. The legal challenge comes at a time when CBSE has announced that its verification and re-evaluation portal for Class 12 students is operational after earlier technical disruptions. Thousands of students are currently accessing the system to apply for answer sheet verification and re-evaluation, making the issue particularly significant for those awaiting revised results. Education experts note that board examination marks continue to play a crucial role in admissions, scholarship opportunities, and eligibility criteria for several competitive and higher education programs. As a result, any concerns regarding evaluation accuracy attract widespread attention from students, parents, and academic institutions.

Go to Source