Ayodhya Probe: SIT Widens Scope, Scrutinises Land Deals Alongside Donation Theft Case

The Special Investigation Team (SIT) has intensified its probe into the alleged Ram Temple donation theft case in Ayodhya, expanding its investigation to include suspected irregularities in land purchases linked to the temple trust. Officials are continuing field inquiries, document verification, and questioning of individuals associated with the Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Teerth Kshetra Trust. According to sources, the SIT has increased the scope of its investigation after being granted additional time to complete its report. The team is now examining both the alleged donation misappropriation and land acquisition records to identify possible financial discrepancies. During recent visits, investigators questioned several trust members, including Gopal Rao and Dr. Anil Mishra, and reviewed documents related to land transactions and payment records. Officials have also indicated that Champat Rai, the Trust’s General Secretary, may be questioned to clarify his role and provide explanations regarding allegations linked to land deals. However, no formal conclusions or findings have been announced by the investigating agency at this stage. In parallel proceedings, police have continued action against accused individuals in the donation theft case. One of the accused, Avinash Shukla, was recently taken on custodial remand following a court order for further interrogation and recovery efforts. Authorities are also pursuing related leads, including verification of assets and possible financial trails connected to the case. Separately, local authorities have issued notices to individuals linked to construction and property-related approvals, seeking clarification on documentation and compliance with building regulations. Officials have stated that further action, if required, will be taken based on responses and legal review. The SIT is expected to submit its findings by mid-July, and officials say the investigation remains active and ongoing. No final determination of guilt has been made, and all individuals named in the probe are yet to be proven responsible in court.

Go to Source