Candace Owens (Image via Getty Images)
Candace Owens is facing another wave of online criticism after a viral X post questioned the credibility of her recent investigation into Officer Bagley. The post quickly gained traction after alleging that Owens had later reversed key accusations she made during her coverage. The criticism has fueled another heated debate over the commentator’s reporting style, with social media users once again split over her handling of the case.
Viral post claims Candace Owens walked back allegations against Officer Bagley
A widely shared post from the X account Cinema Shogun accused Owens of presenting inaccurate information before later correcting herself. The post argued that her audience continued to support her despite what it described as factual errors.The post read:”Candace Owens doesn’t even try to pretend that her fake “investigation” is serious anymore.Because she knows she already has her audience wrapped around her finger.When they tell you that you have to watch her full show to understand her conspiracies.This is the type of pure podslop that you’re missing out on.Stuff that even a child should be able to see right through.The funny part about this little song and dance number she just did is that she had to walk back all of the false allegations she made against the officer in the next episode. Turns out her information was completely wrong as she was confidently singing to her audience.Not surprised at all.” The criticism centered on Owens’ discussion of Officer Bagley, with the poster alleging that later information contradicted earlier claims made during her show. While supporters defended Owens, others pointed to the exchange as another example of how online investigations can quickly become controversial before all available evidence is reviewed.
Candace Owens’ comments about Officer Bagley draw renewed attention
The debate intensified after a clip from Owens’ show circulated online, in which she discussed footage she said identified who Officer Bagley was standing with on a rooftop. During the segment, Owens said:”lucky for Officer Bagley, I went combing through all the footage that was sent to me on September 10th, and lo and behold, Officer Bagley gets up there at 1244, I was able to find some footage of who Officer Bagley was with. It was captured by a bystander at 1247 PM. Thank you, Candace. Oh my gosh, you’re welcome, Officer Bagley. I’m sure that’s what you wanted. You just probably wanted to positively ID who was on the lousy rooftop center with you.””And despite all of the resources of the feds and UVU police and all the cameras, you couldn’t do it before that preliminary hearing when you sit down with your lawyer and try to make sure that you have every possible detail remembered. But here I am to save the day. Here is the footage. Let’s watch that. 1247 PM. Random person walking and they catch lousy rooftop. Who could that be? Who is that? Dear who? Oh man, in a plain clothes.”The latest exchange has once again placed Owens at the center of a polarized online conversation. Critics argue the viral post raises questions about the accuracy of her reporting, while supporters continue to defend her independent investigations and challenge the criticism directed at her.As the discussion continues across social media, the broader debate remains unchanged. Supporters see Owens as someone willing to question official narratives, while critics argue that high-profile claims should be backed by verified evidence before being presented as fact.
