A Bangladeshi migrant has won the right to remain in Britain after a court ruled that he cannot be deported because he would face a 20-year prison sentence on explosives charges if he returned home.The man, referred to in court as MM, was granted asylum after successfully arguing that the charges against him in Bangladesh were false and politically motivated. He said he had been targeted by the previous Awami League government because of his links to an opposing political group, reports the Daily Mail. The Home Office accepted that the bomb charges were probably bogus but said that he could safely return because the political situation in Bangladesh had changed. However, the Upper Tribunal ruled in his favour.MM told the tribunal that he was a “political leader” of Islami Chhatra Shibir, the student wing of the Islamist Jamaat-e-Islami party. He said the Awami League had brought false criminal charges against him in 2015 while he was in Cyprus.He provided court documents showing that he had been convicted in his absence and sentenced to 20 years in prison. The documents were verified as genuine. Seven other men, including Ahsan Habib, Mostafa Kamal, Mehedi Hasan, Rabiul Islam, Monowar Hossain, Jamirul Islam and Moynul Islam, were previously convicted and given the same sentence.Upper Tribunal Judge Madeleine Reeds said: “[It was] confirmed that the [migrant’s] case relied upon the preserved finding that there were genuinely issued court documents demonstrating that he had been convicted and sentenced to 20 years imprisonment and that there were two further outstanding arrest warrants and the question was what risk the [he] faced on return in light of having been convicted in absentia and considering the country information.”They added: “He submitted that the Home Office’s approach to the case was difficult to follow in light of the preserved finding that the documents were genuinely issued documents from the court that were politically motivated and false rather than based on any criminal conduct.”Also: “Those documents having been found to be genuine, is therefore determinative of the appeal in MM’s favour.”The Home Office argued that the removal of Sheikh Hasina and the Awami League from power in August 2024 meant MM would no longer be at risk. After months of student-led protests that turned into a nationwide uprising, Hasina resigned and fled to India. A United Nations report said up to 1,400 people were killed during the unrest, most shot by security forces.Judge Reeds said the Awami League had not been fully removed from power and still had supporters inside government offices and law enforcement. She referred to reports saying the country remains unstable and that some innocent people have been arrested while authorities review cases believed to be politically motivated.She concluded: “I therefore conclude that there is a reasonable likelihood on these particular facts of the [migrant] being detained for what both parties accept are politically motivated charges and conviction and which are not legitimate and do not reflect any wrongdoing by [him].”And added: “Whilst they relate to events from the previous regime, the conviction remains and the sentence is a long one and on the evidence as it stands, there is a real risk that he will not be released on bail.”The tribunal allowed his appeal, meaning he will remain in UK.
