Rahul
had
allegedly
desc ibed
Sava ka
as
a
“ eceive
of
pe sio
f om
B itishe s”
a d
“a
se va t
of
B itishe s”
at
a
ews
co fe e ce
i
2022.
Noti g
that
the e
was
o
sa ctio
to
p osecute
leade
of
the
oppositio
i
Lok
Sabha
Ga dhi
fo
his
ema ks
agai st
V
D
Sava ka ,
Sup eme
Cou t
F iday
quashed
p oceedi gs
agai st
him
i itiated
by
a
Luck ow
cou t.
Rahul
had
allegedly
desc ibed
Sava ka
as
a
” eceive
of
pe sio
f om
B itishe s”
a d
“a
se va t
of
B itishe s”
at
a
ews
co fe e ce
i
2022.
SC,
which
had
give
a
ea ful
to
Rahul
at
the
last
hea i g,
co cluded
that
c imi al
p oceedi gs
agai st
him
we e
u te able
fo
wa t
of
sa ctio .
A
be ch
of
Justices
Dipa ka
Datta
a d
Sheel
Nagu
allowed
Rahul’s
appeal
o
the
g ou d
of
lack
of
sa ctio ,
eve
befo e
se io
advocate
Abhishek
Ma u
Si ghvi
could
a gue
the
case
o
behalf
of
the
Co g ess
MP.