Representative image
NEW DELHI: A study comparing homoeopathy with conventional primary care in infants has been retracted by the European Journal of Pediatrics, citing serious flaws in the study design.In a retraction note, the journal’s editor said concerns were raised after publication about the methodology of the randomised controlled trial, particularly the absence of blinding and placebo controls. A post-publication review found that these shortcomings could introduce “significant bias” in the interpretation of the data and conclusions.The editor said the flaws were fundamental and could not be corrected through an erratum, adding that there was no longer confidence in the reliability of the article.The study, published in 2024, examined homoeopathic treatment versus standard primary care in children during the first 24 months of life, a period requiring high ethical and scientific safeguards.According to the journal, the authors have been invited to submit a revised manuscript addressing the concerns. However, the retraction note states that the authors do not agree with the decision, a position conveyed by lead author Menachem Oberbaum. The paper involved authors from multiple institutions, including India, and had drawn attention because it compared an alternative system of medicine with conventional care in a vulnerable age group.Although the article remains available as an open-access publication, it is now clearly labelled as retracted. The publisher, Springer Nature, said it remains neutral on jurisdictional claims and institutional affiliations.The retraction underscores the need for rigorous trial design, especially in studies involving infants, where lack of blinding and placebo controls can strongly influence outcomes.