A major political and social controversy has erupted after Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind chief Maulana Mahmood Madani once again defended the concept of “jihad” in a public statement. Madani, who recently made similar remarks, reiterated that jihad should be taught in schools, arguing that it is a “sacred Islamic term” and essential for the nation. According to him, people must know what jihad means, how many types there are, who can practice it, and under what circumstances it is permitted. Madani accused those who oppose the term of being “enemies of Islam” and “traitors.” He argued that no religion should be insulted, and targeting jihad specifically reflects hostility toward Islam. He also alleged that certain political leaders, including Union ministers and chief ministers, deliberately misuse the word “jihad” to defame Islam and spread negativity. His remarks have triggered a sharp political reaction. Congress MP Imran Masood supported the view that “jihad is a sacred word” and should not be misused. Meanwhile, critics claim Madani’s comments may inflame communal tensions by reviving a sensitive debate around religious terminology. As the controversy grows, the debate over the meaning, misuse, and political framing of “jihad” has once again taken center stage in the national discourse

