"
title="
A tabloid report has stirred a new controversy around US President Donald Trump’s state visit to Britain. RadarOnline claimed that Trump left his guest suite at Windsor Castle in poor condition, with unnamed sources saying royal staff were “disgusted” by what they found after he checked out. Buckingham Palace has not commented. The claim remains unverified.According to the report, staff found takeaway containers and traces of cosmetic tan in the room. The story also mentions hair products and general clutter that, the outlet says, required special attention from housekeeping. The piece relies on anonymous sources and provides no on-the-record testimony. That is why other publications covering it have flagged the account as an allegation rather than a confirmed fact.The King and Queen hosted President Trump and the First Lady at Windsor on September 17 during the state visit. The Royal Household’s schedule for that day records the formal welcome and the carriage procession through the estate, followed by events inside the castle. These details are on the record and separate from the tabloid claim about a messy room.
There is also a practical reason the visit centred on Windsor. State visit ceremonies have shifted from Buckingham Palace to Windsor Castle while long-running refurbishment work continues at the London residence. Royal reporting last year said the change would last until 2027. That timetable explains why the banquet and other formalities were in Windsor rather than at the palace.Windsor, however, was more than a logistical substitute. The banquet staged inside the castle’s medieval halls doubled as Britain’s most potent diplomatic theatre. King Charles and Queen Camilla presided over a guest list heavy on finance and technology — Blackstone’s Stephen Schwarzman, Bank of America’s Brian Moynihan, Apple’s Tim Cook, OpenAI’s Sam Altman, Google DeepMind’s Demis Hassabis, and Salesforce’s Marc Benioff were all present, alongside media baron Rupert Murdoch. The symbolism was unmistakable: Britain could still summon global power brokers to honour Trump, if only to remind him of the networks he stood to gain by cooperating.Charles’s toast combined lavish praise for Anglo-American ties with carefully worded references to climate change and Ukraine — areas where Trump has been openly sceptical. Wrapped in ceremony, the nudges were unlikely to trigger the president’s temper. Trump, meanwhile, revelled in the flattery, at one point describing himself as “the first American president welcomed here,” brushing aside both his own 2018 Windsor encounter and past White House–royal dinners at Buckingham Palace.For Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the spectacle was strategic. With Trump’s tariffs and transactional diplomacy threatening Britain’s post-Brexit reset, Windsor’s pageantry offered a way to flatter the president’s taste for status and gilded grandeur while advancing harder conversations on trade and NATO commitments. Even Murdoch’s placement — present but kept at a distance after months of legal spats with Trump — showed how carefully choreographed the evening was.Outside the castle walls, protesters projected images linking Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, a reminder that pageantry could only shield him so far from controversy. Still, for one night Windsor served its purpose: a fortress of ceremony insulating the guest of honour from political storms beyond the moat.Online reaction to the “messy room” claim was instant. Clips and headlines framed the story as another culture-clash moment between Trump’s style and the monarchy’s traditions. Some users accepted the account as written and demanded an official response from the palace or Trump’s office. Others questioned the absence of named sources and urged caution. The pace of the debate owed more to social media dynamics than to new facts.At the time of writing, the allegation rests on a single tabloid report. No palace staff member has gone on the record. There is no statement from Buckingham Palace confirming or denying the specifics. The White House has not issued a comment addressing the description of the room. Until that changes, the claim should be treated as unverified.
