Raj i
Ra i,
a
atio al-level
spo tswoma
with
multiple
medals,
was
de ied
a
p omotio
i
2013
despite
a
di ective
by
the
Ce t al
Admi ist ative
T ibu al
i
Sept
2012
to
co side
he
case.
NEW
DELHI:
A
atio al-level
spo tswoma ,
employed
as
a
safaiwala
(g oup
D
employee)
i
ailways
si ce
2003,
has
bee
awaiti g
p omotio
to
g oup
C
level
fo
last
two
decades
despite
the
ailway
mi ist y’s
policy
to
g a t
out-of-tu
fi st
p omotio
to
medal-wi i g
employees,
a
c ite io
she
had
fulfilled
by
wi i g
two
medals
i
atio al
eve ts.A
decade
afte
wi i g
medals
but
ot
getti g
p omotio
as
pe
the
policy,
Raj i
Ra i
moved
Pu jab
a d
Ha ya a
HC
i
2016
with
a
w it
petitio ,
which
got
dismissed
o
tech ical
g ou ds.
He
appeal
agai st
the
HC
o de
has
bee
pe di g
i
SC
si ce
Nov
2016.
Joi
co ve satio
All
Comme ts
→
Sha e
you
thoughts
i
the
comme ts
I sightful
Readi g
Developme t
Comme t
Be
espectful
·
TOI
commu ity
guideli es
It
was
last
hea d
o
Ja
9,
2017,
whe
a
be ch
of
Justices
J
Chelameswa
a d
A
M
Sap e
admitted
he
petitio
a d
asked
the
U io
govt
to
file
a
espo se
i
eight
weeks.
O
May
15,
2018,
egist a
Kapil
Mehta
had
eco ded
that
stateme t
of
case
had
ot
bee
filed
by
a y
of
the
pa ties
despite
expi y
of
the
time
g a ted.
He
had
asked
fo
the
case
to
be
listed
befo e
the
cou t
as
pe
ules.
Howeve ,
he
petitio
co ti ued
to
gathe
dust
till
he
cou sel
Wed esday
equested
a
be ch
headed
by
CJI
Su ya
Ka t
fo
a
ea ly
hea i g.
A
visibly
u happy
CJI
di ected
the
egist y
to
list
the
petitio
fo
hea i g
o
Aug
21.Raj i
said
she
was
due
fo
p omotio
i
2005
afte
wi i g
medals
but
was
de ied
the
be efit
of
fi st
p omotio
o
the
g ou d
that
o e
of
the
fou
eve ts
she
had
pa ticipated
i
did
ot
qualify
as
a
atio al
eve t.
She
said
the
ules
p esc ibed
pa ticipatio
i
o ly
two
eve ts.
Raj i
said
she
had
wo
a
b o ze
medal
at
52 d
No the
Railway
Athletic
Meet
i
Feb
2005,
gold
medal
at
44th
Se io
Natio al
I te -State
competitio
i
July
2004
a d
ep ese ted
ailways
i
ope
Natio al
i
Mumbai
i
Sept
2004,
secu i g
fou th
positio .Raj i
was
de ied
a
p omotio
i
2013
despite
a
di ective
by
Ce t al
Admi ist ative
T ibu al
to
ailways
i
Sept
2012
to
co side
he
case.
Whe
she
challe ged
the
decisio ,
both
CAT
a d
HC
dismissed
he
petitio s.
