Iran-US Peace Talks Stalled: Khamenei Adviser Rejects Trump Meeting Claim, Sets Conditions

A fresh diplomatic twist has emerged from Tehran as a senior adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader has cast doubt on the prospects of renewed engagement between Iran and the United States. The remarks come amid ongoing speculation surrounding potential dialogue and a broader peace understanding between the two countries. Mohsen Rezaei, a prominent military adviser to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has reportedly rejected suggestions that a meeting between former US President Donald Trump and Iran’s top leadership is under consideration. His statement contradicts recent comments attributed to Trump, who had indicated that meeting Iran’s leadership would be an honor and suggested that channels of communication remained open. Rezaei also claimed that efforts toward a potential Iran-US peace arrangement remain stalled, challenging assertions that meaningful progress is being made through ongoing discussions. The comments highlight the continuing gap between public messaging from Washington and Tehran regarding the status of diplomatic engagement. According to Rezaei, a major obstacle remains the issue of Iranian assets frozen under US sanctions. He stated that any serious movement toward negotiations would require the release of approximately $24 billion in Iranian funds currently blocked abroad. Without concrete action on this matter, he suggested, meaningful talks are unlikely to advance. The adviser further emphasized that responsibility for the next step lies with Washington, indicating that the future of any diplomatic breakthrough depends largely on decisions taken by the US administration. The latest statements underscore the fragile nature of relations between Iran and the United States, which have remained strained for years due to disputes over sanctions, regional security, and nuclear policy. International observers are closely watching developments, as any progress—or setback—in negotiations could have significant implications for regional stability and global energy markets. Further responses from US officials are awaited.

Go to Source