On the 35th day of the ongoing Middle East conflict, Iran has announced a significant development regarding the Strait of Hormuz. The country revealed it will jointly operate the strategic waterway with Oman, introducing a new navigation protocol for vessel movements. Iran’s deputy foreign minister emphasized that the northern section of the strait will remain under Iranian control while the southern portion will be managed by Oman, making the collaboration legally necessary to implement new regulations. The protocol is part of a broader Iranian strategy to strengthen its regional influence, alongside key “power centers” in the area. These include Power One, a strategic island; Power Two, a missile hub; Power Three, a naval operations base; Power Four, an underwater drone system; and Power Five, a mine deployment zone. Collectively, these centers enhance Iran’s operational and military presence in the region, giving it control over critical maritime routes. Iran has also announced a toll system for vessels passing through the strait. The approval process involves multiple layers, including the Security Council, Iranian Parliament, Guardian Council, and finally, the president’s sanction, ensuring legal enforcement of the toll. Meanwhile, escalating hostilities continue across the region. The United States and Israel destroyed Iran’s strategic B-One bridge, leaving it split in two, resulting in eight fatalities and around 95 injuries. Iran released a video claiming to have downed a US fighter jet near Qeshm Island, though Washington denies the incident. Kuwait’s air defense intercepted an Iranian missile and drone attack, preventing further damage. These events indicate a highly tense and dynamic situation, where Iran combines diplomatic collaboration with Oman, military posturing, and infrastructure control to reinforce its influence, even as hostilities escalate. The joint protocol in Hormuz reflects Tehran’s attempt to assert authority while managing international sensitivities, signaling a new phase in the ongoing conflict.

