A major controversy has emerged regarding the new rules proposed by the University Grants Commission (UGC). Reports indicate that the UGC is preparing to form a committee to finalize these rules, which have already sparked nationwide protests. Demonstrators and social organizations across the country have expressed strong opposition, claiming that the new regulations could increase caste-based discrimination rather than reduce it. Critics argue that the new rules, while aiming for equality, have included Other Backward Classes (OBCs) along with Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) in the list of groups considered victims of discrimination. According to opponents, this inclusion could inadvertently lead to more disputes over caste privileges and create further divisions in society. Some protesters have described the rules as biased and potentially harmful, suggesting that they may empower dominant caste groups to manipulate the system. The UGC, however, maintains that the intent behind the new regulations is to ensure broader social justice and equal opportunities for all communities historically subjected to discrimination. With protests continuing nationwide and the committee formation underway, the debate around the new UGC rules remains highly sensitive, with social, political, and academic stakeholders closely watching developments.

